Legal Opinion

McGown v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1892No. 7387PublishedCited by 30 opinions

A statement of the testimony discussed is given in the brief for appellant. The opinion gives the nature and result of the suit.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Judge,

Section B. —W. T. McGown, appellant, as the surviving husband of Susan M. McGown, instituted this suit against the appellee company in the District Court of Hays, on December 13, 1888. Appellant sought to recover the sum of $20,000 as actual and $20,000 as exemplary damages for personal injuries received by his wife, resulting, as he alleges, in her death.

The defendant’s answer consisted of a general demurrer, general denial, a special plea that the injury, if any, was due, not to the negligence of the defendant, but to that of the sleeping car company, its agents, or servants,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Jody Dawkins Fenslage v. Donald Ray Dawkins, F. H. DawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Dawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API