Legal Opinion · Dissent
Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 26, 2012No. 2011-1308PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge
ORDER
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Citrix Systems, Inc. (“Citrix”) moves to dismiss as premature Alexander S. Orenshteyn’s (“Orenshteyn”) appeal of an October 1, 2010, order granting in part a motion for sanctions. Orenshteyn opposes.
On April 6, 2002, Orenshteyn filed a complaint against Citrix alleging patent infringement. During the course of litigation, the district court granted in part Citrix’s motion for sanctions against Orenshteyn and his prior counsel, and referred the matter to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation to determine the amount of sanctions. Subsequently, the district…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor. Nancy Knupfer, Trustee v. John Lindblade, in Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor, John Lindblade v. Nancy Knupfer, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kovacic v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Elbit Systems Land and C4i Ltd v. Hughes Network Systems, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.