Legal Opinion

Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 22, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

823 A.2d 789 (2003)

176 N.J. 397

Annabelle CRIPPEN, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Crippen, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CENTRAL JERSEY CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and

Gallo Industries, Inc., XYZ Company, 1-100 (a fictitious name) and/or John Doe (a fictitious name), Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 3, 2003.

Decided May 22, 2003.

Robert G. Hicks, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant (Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks & Zarin, attorneys).

Michael J. Marone, Morristown, argued the cause for respondent (McElroy,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Verniero; Concurrence · Zazzali.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API