Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1922No. Civ. No. 3856PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries suffered by a child under five years of age, who sues by her guardian ad litem. Under stipulation the cause was tried together with an action for damages for the death of one Kate Johnston, an adult who lost her life in the same accident in which plaintiff in this cause was injured. The trial was by a jury. In their main circumstances the two causes of action were intimately related, as the plaintiff child was being led by the hand by the decedent when the accident occurred. The trial judge instructed the jury to render…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Emerson v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Young v. Atlantic Avenue RailroadNew York City Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Channell v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. O'MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Mercado v. HoeflerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API