Legal Opinion
Palasek v. Misita
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated March 5, 2001, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence demonstrating that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury (see, Insurance Law § 5102…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Goldin v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Monaco v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Decayette v. Kreger Truck Renting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Diaz v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hodder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Claude v. ClementsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Philippe v. IvoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Howard v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003