Legal Opinion

WT Wang, Inc. v. NEW YORK STATE DEP'T OF TAXATION & FIN.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Although recited to have been “on the law” a reading of the memorandum of the Appellate Division discloses that it declined to entertain this action for declaratory judgment as “an inappropriate vehicle” (88 AD2d 825, 826). We conclude that there was no error of law in the Appellate Division’s substitution of its exercise of discretion for that of Special Term under CPLR 3001 (contrast Dun & Bradstreet v City of New York, 276 NY 198, 206-207).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. W. T. Wang, Inc. v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. Tax Commission of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Bower & Gardner v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Davidson v. Rochester Telephone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Stahlbrodt v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Xerox Corp. v. Department of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API