Knox & Requa v. Marshall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Sixth District. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
Norton, J. concurring.
This is an action to recover the possession or value of one thousand and eighty-nine bales of hay, of which the plaintiffs claim to be the owners and entitled to the possession, and which are alleged to have been unlawfully taken and detained from them by the defendant. It arises upon the following facts : Some time in 1859, one Barnes and' one Brown entered into a contract for the working of a farm in Yolo county upon shares—Brown to furnish the land, the teams and the seed, and Barnes to sow and harvest the grain and cut the hay—the grain and hay, when harvested, to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thornburgh v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Bernal v. HoviousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by9 opinions
- Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Old Settlers Investment Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Baughman v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Callender v. McLeodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.