Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1916No. 4246PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDS OH, Judge.

The indictment contains two counts, the first charging forgery, and the second, passing a forged instrument. The conviction was had under the second count.

There had been a previous conviction under the second count, which was set aside by the trial court because it developed on motion for new trial that one of the jurors was a minor. During this trial appellant in various ways sought to prevent the trial of appellant on the first count, for forgery. The court overruled all of his grounds and tried him on both counts. The court refused to consider appellant’s grounds for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spicer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Batte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Brooks Alias Schofield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Mahs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Nami v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Blevins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API