Feigenspan v. Mulligan
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On demurrer.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, Y. C.
The bill exhibits the following case:
The complainant, a corporation under the laws of New Jersey, the corporate objects and business of which are not stated, held two chattel mortgages, made by the defendants to secure, in the aggregate, $807.50. The larger of these mortgages, and apparently the other as well, covered “certain saloon fixtures at number 463 Avenue C in the city of Bayonne, where the said mortgagors conducted a saloon.”
On or about June 29th, 1900, the complainant lent the defendants $250 for the purpose of obtaining “the license from the mayor and council of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Voight v. Board of Excise CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Degginger v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- McCray v. ChruckyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Novack v. KrauzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946