Legal Opinion

Feigenspan v. Mulligan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 11, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, Y. C.

The bill exhibits the following case:

The complainant, a corporation under the laws of New Jersey, the corporate objects and business of which are not stated, held two chattel mortgages, made by the defendants to secure, in the aggregate, $807.50. The larger of these mortgages, and apparently the other as well, covered “certain saloon fixtures at number 463 Avenue C in the city of Bayonne, where the said mortgagors conducted a saloon.”

On or about June 29th, 1900, the complainant lent the defendants $250 for the purpose of obtaining “the license from the mayor and council of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Voight v. Board of Excise CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Degginger v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. McCray v. ChruckyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Novack v. KrauzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API