Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Cincinnati R. R. v. Wright

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Hanna J.

This case has been here twice before; 13 Inch 213; 18 id, 168. After the latter reversal, an additional paragraph was added to the complaint, by which it was alleged that, in 1852, the plaintiff, being the' owner of the land, &c., conveyed by quit claim to said company a strip of eighty feet wide, through the same, for said road, “ provided said company would make three pits and haul all the.good rail timber on said eighty feet, outside of said space for the use of said pla-intiff; and, also, clear all the timber and brush from off said land';” that the road was constructed upon said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evansville & Crawfordsville Railroad v. HiattIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Howe v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Porter v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. StevensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sisk v. CrumpIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Newhouse v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API