Legal Opinion

Urciolo v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1951No. 1086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

On August 1, 1947, appellant was the highest bidder at a foreclosure sale of real estate under a deed of trust. On October 1, 1947, settlement of the sale was made and the trustees delivered to appellant a deed to the property.1, On October 2 appellant notified the' Water Registrar of his purchase, stating that he' would be responsible for the water supplied to the premises from that date forward. The Registrar insisted' that' appellant pay for water used at the premises from February 4, 1947, the date of the last meter reading, and pay for repairs to the water meter,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Broad Street HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Union Trust Co. v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Holman v. RyonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  4. Spruill v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  5. State Bank of Hardinsburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bartsch v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API