Legal Opinion

DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BRINKMAN Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided September 1, 1978No. A-212PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

The applicant, Dayton Board of Education, has presented to me an application for stay of the judgment and mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which has been denied by Mr. Justice Stewart. In his in-chambers opinion Mr. Justice Stewart stated:

“The applicant urges that this case be stayed because it raises many of the issues presented by Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, ante, p. 1348. Mr. Justice Rehnquist stayed the mandate of the Sixth Circuit in that case on August 11, 1978. A crucial distinction between these cases leads me to believe that this application should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. COLUMBUS BOARD OF EDUCATION Et Al. v. PENICK Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Rims Barber v. Phil BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. E.T. v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  4. State of Louisiana v. BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. State of Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API