Legal Opinion
DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BRINKMAN Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided September 1, 1978No. A-212PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
The applicant, Dayton Board of Education, has presented to me an application for stay of the judgment and mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which has been denied by Mr. Justice Stewart. In his in-chambers opinion Mr. Justice Stewart stated:
“The applicant urges that this case be stayed because it raises many of the issues presented by Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, ante, p. 1348. Mr. Justice Rehnquist stayed the mandate of the Sixth Circuit in that case on August 11, 1978. A crucial distinction between these cases leads me to believe that this application should be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- COLUMBUS BOARD OF EDUCATION Et Al. v. PENICK Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Rims Barber v. Phil BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- E.T. v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- State of Louisiana v. BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- State of Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.