Bowman v. Hart
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice G-reeN
This suit, which the trial judge treated as one for seduction, was abated by direction of the court upon the death of the defendant preceding trial. From the order overruling the motion to revive against defendant’s administrator and abating the suit, the plaintiff has appealed.
There being some controversy as to the nature of this action, an examination of the declaration is required.
The first count, it is conceded, is for the seduction of the plaintiff. v
The second count is for the 'seduction of the same female and avers that said female at the time was an infant over the age of twelve years…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Harris v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Justice v. ClinardTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Hullett v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Johnson v. Maury County Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Goins v. CoulterTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Pickens v. ScarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Medrano v. MCDR, INC.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.