Legal Opinion

People v. Bernard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 10, 1983No. 80SA456PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Chief Justice.

The trial court granted defendant Bernard’s motion pursuant to Crim.P. 35(c) to reduce his 25-35 year sentence as an habitual criminal on the ground that a 1973 burglary conviction was invalid. On appeal, the People assert that the trial court erred. We agree and therefore reverse.

Defendant Bernard was charged with burglary on four separate occasions prior to 1977 and pled guilty to each of those charges. The defendant was again charged in 1977 with second-degree burglary and, in addition, with four counts under the habitual criminal statute for the above mentioned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CaninoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. People v. ColosaccoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. People v. CumbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. People v. PauldinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. People v. SandersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Downer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. People v. WaitsColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. Lester Eugene FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. People v. DuggerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. ValdezColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API