Legal Opinion

Richard Stitely v. Carolyn Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2015No. 14-2302UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

Richard E. Stitely appeals from the magistrate judge’s order upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of disability insurance benefits. On appeal, Stitely raises numerous claims. We have considered the briefs, the magistrate judge’s opinion, and the administrative record, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. * Stitely v. Commissioner, Social Security Admin., No. 1:14-cv-00144-SAG, 2014 WL…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Gregory Smith v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. BROWNLEE v. SAULDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  2. Mattingly v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
  3. Pagans v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. Rifendifer v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
  5. Walkup v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API