Legal Opinion

E. S. Novelty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 2, 1972No. C.R.D. 72-10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WatsoN, Judge:

This civil action contests the denial of five protests. Defendant has moved to dismiss the action on the ground that a jurisdictional prerequisite has not been satisfied, namely, plaintiff has failed to pay the increased duty on entry No. 342322 covered by protest 1001-1-013776. An affidavit to this effect, by the acting assistant chief counsel for Customs Court litigation has been filed with defendant’s motion and plaintiff has, in effect, admitted its failure to pay. Plaintiff, however, requests that the protest containing the defective entry be severed and dismissed and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Novelty Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Novelty Imports, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Border Brokerage Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  4. Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Bradley Time Div. Elgin National Time Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API