Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Leonard

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 15, 1954No. Civil 4286PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

In this case I already have determined that the defendants, Reuben Orville Wiebold and Earl Barber Bartlett, were guilty of negligence, proximately causing damage to the plaintiff, and that Wiebold’s negligence is imputable to the defendant Leonard by reason of the relationship of servant and master existing between them; that the cross-claims between Leonard and Reuben Orville Wiebold on the one hand and Earl Barber Bartlett on the other, are barred by the contributory negligence of each; that the doctrine of last clear chance under the facts is not available to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Mitton v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. v. MittonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Kohl v. ArpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. United State,s v. Griffith, Gornall & Carman, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Delmar B. Dennis v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Reynolds v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  5. J & D Towing, LLC v. American Alternative Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API