Legal Opinion

Krause v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1969No. 110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

A number of issues have been raised on appeal:(1) Was it error to admit evidence concerning who was driving the insured automobile?(2) Should certain of the defendant’s exhibits have been allowed as evidence ?(3) Was it error to give the emergency instruction?(4) Was plaintiff negligent as a matter of law?(5) Is the jury’s award of personal damages excessive?(6) Was it error to award damages for future loss of earning capacity?

I. Evidence as to who was driving.

Defendant claims it was error for the trial court to admit evidence tending to establish Mrs. Arntz was driving the insured car at the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Price v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sampson v. LaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fischer v. Cleveland Punch & Shear Works Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API