Legal Opinion
Moye v. Palma
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 31, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
263 N.J. Super. 287 (1993)
622 A.2d 935
IRA MOYE AND ANNETTE MOYE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
RICHARD P. PALMA; JOSE JIMINEZ; X-L PLASTICS, INC.; ARNEL TRUCKING INC.; BLUME, VAZQUEZ, GOLDFADEN, BERKOWITZ, OLIVERAS & DONNELLY, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW; GOLDSTEIN, BALLEN, O'ROURKE & WILDSTEIN, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW, JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE & ABC COMPANY(S), (FICTITIOUS PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHOSE PRESENT IDENTITIES ARE UNKNOWN TO PLAINTIFF(S) JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Ostrowski v. AzzaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Amoroso v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Licenziato v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Slater v. Skyhawk Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999