Legal Opinion

Edwards & Deutsch Lithographing Co. v. Boorman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 9, 1926No. 3685PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Suit by appellant against the appellees for infringement of a copyright for an interest and discount time teller. The trial court dismissed the bill for want of equity. No memorandum was filed, but we may assume that the same questions were presented below as were argued here. No question is made as to the regularity of the proceedings to procure the copyright, and the ownership is admitted. Since 1915 appellant has for each successive year prepared, printed, published, and distributed the copyrighted work under the title of “Heinz Interest and Discount Time Teller.”…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Charles E. Schroeder and Marion S. Schroeder, and Cross-Appellees v. William Morrow and Company and George Banta & Co., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Rockford Map Publishers, Inc. v. Directory Service Company of Colorado, Inc. And Frances A. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API