Legal Opinion
United States v. Artez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2004No. 03-4166PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Friedrich Peter Artez (“Defendant”) was indicted for possession of an unregistered short barrel shotgun, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d) and 5871. Defendant moved to suppress the shotgun as the fruit of an unlawful search of his home. The district court granted Defendant’s motion to suppress, concluding that the search warrant was invalid because not supported by probable cause and that the good faith exception of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), did not apply. The government appealed. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we REVERSE…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. PerrineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.