Heidebrink v. Moriwaki
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentGoodloe, J.
(dissenting) — I would affirm the Court of Appeals decision finding the statement of the insured to his *403insurance company is not protected by either the attorney-client privilege, RCW 5.60.060(2), or the work product immunity rule, CR 26(b)(3). The majority does not address the attorney-client privilege issue, limiting its discussion to the work product immunity rule issue. Because of my determination that neither applies, it is necessary to address both issues.
Attorney-Client Privilege
The attorney-client privilege provides:
An attorney or counselor shall not, without the consent of his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Coburn v. SedaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.