Legal Opinion

Schaul v. Kordell

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 22, 2009No. 2008AP2571PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeubauer, J.

¶ 1. Richard Schaul commenced this defamation action against Jeff Kordell for implicating him in a report of elder abuse made under Wis. Stat. § 46.90 (2003-04). Kordell counterclaimed based on § 46.90(4)(b)l.a. and (4)(c) which prohibit retaliation against anyone who has made a good faith report of material abuse, and § 46.90(4)(b)2.c., which gives the person who is subject to retaliation the right to commence an action for damages caused by retaliation. Schaul now appeals from a summary judgment dismissal of his defamation action. Schaul additionally appeals from a later judgment on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lake Beulah Management District v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  2. Huyck v. Milwaukee Area Technical CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API