Legal Opinion

People v. Kain

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1989No. C004334PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

We hold that the 1986 amendment of subdivision (i) of Penal Code section 1538.5, effective January 1, 1987 (Stats. 1986, ch. 52, § 1) did not change the requirement of People v. Lilienthal (1978) 22 Cal.3d 891, 896 [150 Cal.Rptr. 910, 587 P.2d 706], that a defendant must challenge the legality of a search in superior court in order to obtain review of the issue in an appeal to this court. (Further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.)

Procedural History

In September 1987 defendant was charged by consolidated complaints in municipal court with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. People v. DossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. GalindoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. Saucedo CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API