South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Chattanooga
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MATHERNE, Judge.
The plaintiffs, utility companies furnishing telephone service and natural gas to the citizens of Chattanooga, Tennessee, brought this lawsuit for a declaratory judgment on whether they were entitled to reimbursement for their expenses in relocating their property as a result of the widening and rebuilding of certain streets by the city. The city appeals the chancellor’s decision that the utilities were entitled to be reimbursed by the city.
Since 1975, the City of Chattanooga has been engaged in a three-year “Community Development Program.” Funds for this purpose have been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pack v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Frazier v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Knoxville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Bristol Tennessee Housing Authority v. Bristol Gas Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Lebanon v. BairdTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Metropolitan Government v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007