Legal Opinion
Janna Schudde, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Dream Games Teknoloji Anonim Şirketi
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 10, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01215Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 3 4 JANNA SCHUDDE, individually and on Case No. C24-1215RSM 5 behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 6 Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 7 v. 8 DREAM GAMES TEKNOLOJİ ANONİM 9 ŞİRKETİ, a foreign corporation, 10 Defendant. 11 12 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Dream Games Teknoloji Anonim 13 Şirketi’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), 14 and 9(b). Dkt. #18. Plaintiff Janna Schudde opposes with two briefs after receiving…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.