Block v. Fruehauf
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
White, J.
It appears that the appellant, the appellee, and a majority of the court accept the findings made by the Full Industrial Board of Indiana as sufficient to enable us to decide *75whether the award based thereon is, or is not, contrary to law. I believe the findings are wholly inadequate for that purpose. But before stating why I believe the findings made by the full board are inadequate to permit a review of the award by this court, I feel it would be helpful to consider what the law is, or should be, concerning horseplay in workmen’s compensation cases.
The Board’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Carlton v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.