Legal Opinion · Dissent

Block v. Fruehauf

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1969No. 269A24Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

White, J.

It appears that the appellant, the appellee, and a majority of the court accept the findings made by the Full Industrial Board of Indiana as sufficient to enable us to decide *75whether the award based thereon is, or is not, contrary to law. I believe the findings are wholly inadequate for that purpose. But before stating why I believe the findings made by the full board are inadequate to permit a review of the award by this court, I feel it would be helpful to consider what the law is, or should be, concerning horseplay in workmen’s compensation cases.

The Board’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Carlton v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API