Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Morrow v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 2, 1939No. 6706PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

All of the assigned errors will be considered together for they are somewhat related. The first deals with the alleged improper admission of evidence showing plaintiff had been paid by the Government as compensation for disabilities, amounts varying from $8 to $125 per month — a total of over $9,000. This evidence was received after plaintiff had opened the door, so defendant asserts, and had .shown payments of $1,539 in August, 1930. Plaintiff argues that the evidence of payments of $75 to $125 per month for the years immediately succeeding 1930 prejudiced his ease…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  3. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. Cockrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. United States v. ChiarellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Robert H. Slocum v. United States of America, Leroy Eaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. J. D. Charles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API