Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Board of Education of Cincinnati School District

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1965No. 9706PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The Schlade Corporation was engaged in the plumbing business and entered into a contract with the Board of Education of the Cincinnati School District for the furnishing and installation of the plumbing in the building of the Gamble Junior High School. As a result of the financial difficulty of the Schlade Corporation, Mr. Goldman became the assignee for the benefit of creditors who brings this suit.

Plaintiff claims compensation for extra work and/or damages arising out of the contract, dated March 3, 1954, based on alleged extra work not contemplated by the contract with respect to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Russo v. ChittickOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. North Royalton Education Ass'n v. North Royalton Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Figley v. City of SalemOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API