Legal Opinion

Van Norden v. AUTO CREDIT COMPANY, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1963No. 40054PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The overruling of plea of material alteration to a suit on a conditional-sale contract and note is not a final judgment to which a writ of error will lie. If the plea had been sustained, as contended for by the plaintiff in error (defendant below), it would still have been necessary to have judgment entered for the defendant in order to terminate the case; and in order to review a sustaining or overruling of the plea there must be an assignment of error upon the final judgment in the case. See, as to a plea in bar, Medernach v. Bazemore, 100 Ga. App. 721 (112 SE2d 272)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levy v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Besco Corporation v. BuiceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Turner v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Medernach v. BazemoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Norden v. AUTO CREDIT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Williams v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API