Legal Opinion

In Re Youmans

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1993No. 91-SP-664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In January, 1991, respondent pled guilty in New Jersey to four criminal offenses, including conspiracy to commit theft by deception, 1 and was subsequently disbarred by consent from the New Jersey Bar. Before us is a report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be disbarred both on the basis of the imposition of reciprocal discipline under D.C.Bar R. XI, § 11, and of his conviction of a crime of moral turpitude under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989). 2 Respondent has not appeared at any stage of the proceedings to contest this action, and we see no reason…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In Re YoumansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Matter of BoydDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. RodgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CohenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API