Legal Opinion
United States v. Asmar Abdul-Hamid, Also Known as Michael Fields
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 16, 1992No. 91-2137PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
Asmar Abdul-Hamid appeals his sentence after the district court found that he violated the conditions of his probation and imposed on him a term of five years’ imprisonment. Abdul-Hamid argues that the district court erred by refusing to apply the ABA Standards Relating to Probation, Section 5.1 (1970) (“ABA Standards”), which recommend alternatives to incarceration for probation violations.
I
In 1984, defendant-appellant Asmar Abdul-Hamid entered two guilty pleas: one for inducing an individual to travel in interstate commerce for the purpose of executing a scheme to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- James Deppe, William Deppe, William Clinton Deppe, and Charles Stephen Aggert v. Herman Tripp and Howard WeitekampCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Joseph AdamoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jack Lee ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. David PardueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- James E. Knight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- In re Habeas Corpus CasesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. Daniel D. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Thomas George Traynoff, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.