Legal Opinion
ESTATE OF CROUCH v. Madison County
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 6, 2010No. 1:08-cv-01157PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 37], filed on September 4, 2009, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff, the Estate of Joshua Crouch, brings this claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants, Madison County, Brian Parnell, Michael Barnes, and Craig Crisp, alleging that the constitutional rights of Joshua Crouch were violated by the named defendants. The Complaint also asserts a state law claim of negligence. For the reasons…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barton Ex Rel. Estate of Barton v. TaberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Gary Orlowski v. Milwaukee County, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Barton Ex Rel. Estate of Barton v. TaberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- JOHNSON v. SIBLEYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
- LAUDERDALE v. RUSSELLDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.