MacEdonia Church v. Lancaster Hotel Ltd. Partnership
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The defendants have renewed their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds that the individual plaintiffs lack standing. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is being denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 18, 2006, the defendants moved to dismiss the first amended complaint as to all plaintiffs, except for the four individual plaintiffs who visited the Lancaster Host Resort and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shumate v. Twin Tier Hospitality, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Derienzo v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Macedonia Church v. Lancaster Hotel Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- McArthur v. C-Town Super MarketDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- NDN Collective v. Retsel CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024