Grosvenor v. Magill & Latham
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ or Error to the Superior Court of Chicago. This was an action on the ease brought by Grosvenor & Co., against Magill & Latham. In the court below, the verdict and judgment-were for the defendant. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence
This was an action on the ease brought by Grosvenor & Co., against Magill & Latham, on the following contract :
Chicago, July 9, 186J
Bought of Grosvenor & Co., 2,500 barrels Michigan Ho. 1 fine salt^at $3.40 per barrel, afloat, seller’s option, first half of August next; salt to be new, and in good barrels, payable on delivery at Chicago.
MAGILL & LATHAM.
On the trial, the plaintiffs proved an offer to deliver the salt at a quarter before one o’clock, P. M., on thb 16th of August; that it was worth $3.25 per'barrel, afloat, and that the defendants refused to receive it. The plaintiffs asked the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fiedler v. EckfeldtIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Levy v. Chicago National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. MosesIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Denver v. PearceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.