Legal Opinion

Prindle v. Dearborn

New York Family Court

Decided November 19, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPanken, J.

By stipulation between counsel for the parties to this proceeding, the court is to pass upon what would be a fair amount to be awarded to the mother for the maintenance of the respondent’s two children.

A stipulation entered into between counsel in a proceeding of the character before me is binding upon the parties.

Chief Judge Crane, in Matter of Kane v. Necci (269 N. Y. 13), said: “ Another law, however, has been passed by the Legislature, chapter 482 of the Laws of 1933, creating in the city of New York the Court of Domestic Relations, proceedings in which are treated as of a civil rather…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Kane v. NecciNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. " Johnston " v. " Johnston "New York Family Court · 1941
  3. Wonneman v. WonnemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Schacht v. SchachtNew York Family Court · 1946
  5. Moses v. MosesNew York Family Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API