Legal Opinion

Rivenbark v. Rivenbark

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 1990No. 23177PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Janice Gail Rivenbark petitioned the Family Court for a legal separation 1 and an award of separate support and maintenance from her husband, James E. Rivenbark. Both parties sought equitable distribution of the marital estate. In addition, the wife sought a restraining order and attorney’s fees. The court granted the legal separation, issued mutual restraining orders, and distributed the marital estate. The court denied the wife’s requests for separate maintenance and support and attorney’s fees. The wife appeals the equitable distribution and the denial of support and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lide v. LideSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Edm v. TamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API