Legal Opinion
Mann v. Yarnell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2007No. 06-2326PublishedCited by 252 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Tony L. Mann brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Springfield (the City), and four of its police officers, Phil Yarnell, Scott Umbarger, Mark Schindler, and Chris Willett, alleging that the officers used excessive force in effectuating his arrest and that the City provided the officers inadequate training, instruction, discipline, and supervision. Mann appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to the appellees. We affirm.
I
The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. 2 In the early evening of October 4, 2001, Mann fired a shot at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Henry Szabla v. City Of Brooklyn ParkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Howard v. Kansas City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Norman Carpenter v. Deputy Harold GageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- McKenney v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Michael Young v. Builders Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Tina Grant v. City of Blytheville, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.