Legal Opinion

Kankakee Park District v. Heidenreich

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1927No. 18495. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Appellee, the Kankakee Park District, instituted in the county court of Kankakee county a proceeding to condemn for park purposes about three acres of land, located in the city of Kankakee on the west bank of the Kankakee river, belonging to appellant, James Heidenreich. On the trial before a jury to determine the amount of damages there was a verdict fixing the value of the property taken at $4000. Contending that the damages awarded are inadequate and that error occurred on the trial which prejudiced his interests, appellant prosecutes this appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict.-

Pr…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Chicago v. LehmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Faust v. HosfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. LambertIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Forest Preserve District v. KercherIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. PelliniIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People Ex Rel. Director of Finance v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. City of Chicago v. BlantonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API