Legal Opinion

Stiffler v. Boehm

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Erlanger, J.:

For enticing away and alienating the affections of plaintiff’s fiancée, thereby causing a breach of their contract to marry, the defendant is proceeded against. The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency. The complaint contains the allegations usual in such causes. An action of the character mentioned is maintainable against one who meddles with the spouse of another, where the relation of husband and wife exists, and its basis is the loss of consortium. But where no marriage was ever consummated, in the absence of a statute, such an action will not lie.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Homan v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Leonard v. WhetstoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Davis v. ConditSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Guida v. PontrelliNew York Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morrow v. YannantuonoNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. MelvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Brown v. GlicksteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Clarahan v. CosperWashington Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API