Legal Opinion

Fishback v. Foster

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1922No. Civil No. 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Navajo. Andrew S. Gibbons, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This is an action in replevin by Ferdinand Fishback, as administrator of the estate of Arthur Fishback, in which he seeks to recover from E. J. Foster, defendant, possession of an automobile, and from a judgment against him and a denial of his motion for a new trial he appeals.

A seven-passenger automobile, bearing Oklahoma license No. 84519 for the year 1918, was left for storage in the Jackson Garage at Holbrook, Arizona, in December, 1918, or January or February, 1919, and remained there until February 7, 1920. Harry Jackson was owner of the business carried on at this garage when the car…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Proctor Smith v. O'BrienNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Aldine Manufacturing Co. v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Oakes v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844
  4. Burrough v. ElyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Younger v. PlunkettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Rickenberg v. Capitol GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Candler v. AshOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Fields v. SteyaertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. City of Phoenix v. A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. (In Re A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API