Legal Opinion

Burradell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1996No. CR 96-602Published

1Opinion of the Court

931 S.W.2d 100 (1996)

326 Ark. 182

Richard BURRADELL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

No. CR 96-602.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

October 7, 1996.

Doug Norwood, Rogers, for Appellant.

David R. Raupp, Asst. Atty. General, Little Rock, for Appellee.

JESSON, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is whether we will prevent a trial judge from exercising his or her contempt authority when a defendant appears in court under the influence of alcohol. The appellant, Richard Burradell, appeared in Rogers Municipal Court for a plea hearing. He had been drinking to such an extent that he smelled of alcohol…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Carle v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Hodges v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Witherspoon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API