Legal Opinion

Drake v. Clay Hardware & Supply Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1931No. 6787PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

This is an action to recover damages for an injury suffered by plaintiff in 1929, while employed by the defendant as a truckdriver. The jury returned a verdict in his favor of $4,000.00 which was sustained by the lower court.

A tire rim on defendant’s truck was cracked. Plaintiff testified that H. O. Crooksbanks, tbe general manager of defendant, told him that the cracks did not “hurt” the rim, to pnt the casing on the rim, and to pnmp np the inner tube to 85 or 90 pounds air pressure. Both the casing and the inner tube were new. The plaintiff followed these instructions…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gregory's Adm'r v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Abell v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State v. JohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Landau v. FarrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Jacobs v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. EdwardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Davis v. PughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Thrasher v. Amere Gas Utilities Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Robertson v. HobsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API