Legal Opinion

Landau v. Farr

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1927No. 5925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President :

The plaintiff in this case was injured by a fall of an elevator in the hotel of the defendant. As damages for her injuries she received a verdict of $1,000, which she seeks to have set aside.

Two affidavits were filed by her with the trial court. One was made by a juror, and the other by a son of the plaintiff, containing what he had been told by a juror As the effect of the affidavits is to impeach the verdict, settled law forbids their consideration. Reynolds v. Tompkins, 23 W. Va. 229 (236).

Plaintiff offers two reasons for setting aside the verdict: One is that she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Parsons v. County Court of Roane CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Farley v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Schmidt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Walters v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jordan v. BeroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Crum v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. French v. SinkfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Richmond v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Raines v. FaulknerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API