State v. Bird

Opinion

Pohlman, Judge:

¶ 1 Lane D. Bird appeals a restitution order, arguing that the trial court erred when calculating the restitution amount. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 After creating a skin care product and establishing a company to manufacture it, Omar Bonada arranged for Bird to help distribute the product. Eventually, Bonada and Bird together decided to dissolve Bonada’s company and incorporate two companies in its place: Clarcon Labs Inc. and Clarcon Distribution Inc. (collectively, Clarcon).

¶ 3 In early 2007, Bird approached his neighbor (Neighbor) and his wife (collectively, Victims)…