Rodemich v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The main issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the appellees on the issue of comprehensive insurance coverage.
The appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Rodemich, were owners of a 1973 Winnebago motor home. On May 7, 1975, Mr. Rodemich was driving the motor home at approximately 15-20 m.p.h. on a paved two-lane road in Alamo State Park, Arizona. According to Mr. Rodemich, a gray four-legged animal, approximately four feet high, suddenly appeared in the roadway. Mr. Rodemich swerved to avoid hitting the animal, causing the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Harbor Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Lawrence v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniArizona Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Patel v. ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Thomas v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. GoettlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Roberts v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.