Legal Opinion

Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. v. Huttner

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 14, 1967No. 66 C 287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”), has brought this declaratory judgment action in which it seeks a determination that it is not liable to pay defendants, and the class they represent, the amount of a dividend declared by the directors of Marshall Savings and Loan Association (“Marshall”). Marshall has, since July 3, 1951, been an FSLIC-insured institution under Title IV of the National Housing Act (“NHA”).

On April 8, 1965 Marshall was in “default” within the meaning of Section 401 (d) of the NHA, 12 U.S.C. § 1724(d), at which time…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Collins v. BoltonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  3. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, a Corporation v. Sidney Huttner, Rose Huttner, Irving Voliner and Gertrude VolinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. Herbert v. National Credit Union Admin. Bd.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
  5. Robin Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API