Legal Opinion
Wakeham v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1990No. 36-3_2UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
914 F.2d 265
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Derrick WAKEHAM, Selma Wakeham Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 88-6696.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1990.
Decided Sept. 7, 1990.
Before POOLE, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- T. J. Starker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- June Pinson Carlton and Charles T. Carlton, as Administrators of the Estate of Thad H. Carlton, and June Carlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- James Alderson, Surviving Husband and Estate of Clarissa E. Alderson, Deceased, James Alderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Rogers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vanguard Ventures, Inc., Aic Management Corporation v. Chestnutt (Mark)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990