Langdon v. Board of Liquor Control

Believing that the Board of Liquor Control made improper rulings on the admissions of the opinions of the chemist, an employee of the Department of Liquor Control, I am of the opinion that there was no evidence before the Board of Liquor Control on which they could make an independent decision that the contents of the bottles placed in evidence had been diluted, refilled or partially refilled in violation of Section 4301.68 of the Eevised Code, and of Eegulation No. 47 of the Board of Liquor Control. Certainly the file does indicate that there was evidence which the state could have properly…