Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald Lee Eastman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1984No. 83-1226PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, District Judge.

Eastman appeals from a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35. Appellant contends that the judge considered hearsay in denying his motion and failed to fully consider his arguments at the hearing of the motion. There is no showing that the judge abused his discretion in denying the motion under Rule 35(b).

Gerald Eastman pled guilty to one count of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314, transportation of stolen monies known to be taken by fraud, and to two counts of violation of 15 U.S.C. § 77q, fraudulent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Wayne Wilburn MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Cliff KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RoyceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  2. People v. Bezon, Q.Superior Court of Guam · 2019
  3. People v. BorjaSuperior Court of Guam · 2018
  4. People v. CepedaSuperior Court of Guam · 2022
  5. People v. NegoSuperior Court of Guam · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API